
Panoramic: Automotive and Mobility 2025
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) announced that it aims to finalize the mandatory rulemaking required to implement SB 253 in the first quarter of 2026. This represents a further delay by CARB after missing the statutory deadline, imposed by SB 219, to finalize a rule by July 1, 2025, and subsequent announcements by CARB that the rule would be finalized in December 2025.
In the meantime, CARB has published a draft Scope 1 and Scope 2 Emissions Reporting Template (Draft Template) for use in filing disclosures mandated by SB 253. Staff is seeking public comments on the Draft Template and an accompanying memorandum until October 27, 2025.
SB 253 – as amended by SB 219 – mandates that public disclosure of a reporting entity’s scope 1 and 2 emissions shall be made starting in 2026 “on or by a date to be determined by the state board.” When SB 253 was signed by Governor Newsom in 2023, the statute directed CARB to adopt implementing regulations by January 1, 2025. Recognizing the complexity of this endeavor, in late June of 2024 the Governor proposed legislation that would have delayed the deadline for CARB rulemaking to implement SB 253 by two years (until January 1, 2027). The legislature failed to vote on the Governor’s proposal before the end of the 2024 legislative session and, in adopting SB 219 on September 27, 2024, only provided CARB six additional months – through July 1, 2025 – to adopt implementing regulations. CARB failed to meet this deadline and, until last week, had repeatedly assured the regulated community that it intended to finalize the implementing regulations by December 2025. Now CARB has signaled that the December deadline will not be met either.
Last week, CARB notified the public that it is now aiming to finalize implementing regulations during the first quarter of 2026. The effort is a complex process because of the breadth of SB 253’s applicability and limited direction in the statute itself; in addition to specifying a 2026 reporting deadline, the regulations are expected to address a host of other critical issues, including defining what it means to “do business in California” and providing instructions for calculation of Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions. CARB has cited the large volume of public input Staff has already received as driving the delay.
Because SB 253 is not self-executing, this further delay will likely impact the deadline for reporting entities to file their first Scope 1 and 2 emission reports. As of its August 21, 2025, public workshop CARB was contemplating a June 30, 2026, implementation deadline for SB 253 Scope 1 and Scope 2 reporting. That timing may be infeasible if regulations are not finalized until the Spring of 2026.
On October 10, 2025, CARB published its Draft Template and an accompanying guidance memorandum. The Template is intended to streamline reporting, particularly for entities disclosing greenhouse gas emissions for the first time. These materials are available for download from CARB’s website, here. Key points from the memorandum include the following:
CARB is seeking public comments on the Draft Template via its public docket until October 27, 2025. CARB has specifically requested input on the following key elements that could impact how corporate emissions data is structured and compared:
The broad range of expertise at Hogan Lovells US LLP – including the Environment and Natural Resources, Litigation/Consumer Products, Sustainable Finance and Investment, Corporate and Finance, and Infrastructure, Energy, Resources and Projects teams – are available to assist clients with submitting feedback to CARB during its rulemaking process and complying with GHG emissions disclosures pursuant to SB 253, and can help you understand interactions with other relevant sustainability-related reporting regimes required globally.
Stay ahead with timely curated developments, insights and thought leadership on ESG regulation with our ESG Regulatory Alerts tool.
This note is intended to be a general guide to the latest climate transition developments. It does not constitute legal advice.
Authored by Tom Boer and Maia Jorgensen.