
Panoramic: Automotive and Mobility 2025
In today's volatile global economy, medical device companies are redrawing their supply chain maps. Disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, shaken by geopolitical tensions, and propelled by federal priorities that increasingly link national security to domestic manufacturing, the strategies of near-shoring and friend-shoring are gaining momentum.
But shifting where a device is manufactured isn't merely a logistical decision—it's a regulatory transformation. For FDA-regulated firms bound by ISO 13485, this move demands far more than an updated shipping address. It requires reimagining quality systems, contracts, and inspections from the ground up, and may even require a new marketing authorization.
Near-shoring refers to relocating manufacturing closer to the U.S.—to places like Mexico, Costa Rica, or Puerto Rico—where physical proximity offers logistical advantages and faster responses to quality events. Friend-shoring, on the other hand, involves shifting production to politically stable allies such as Canada, India, or Poland to hedge against sanctions, tariffs, and trade wars.
From a regulatory standpoint, either path requires recalibrating your FDA compliance and QMS. ISO 13485 is not geography-dependent—your new facility must meet the same global standards for design controls, CAPA, complaint handling, and internal audits. Likewise, the FDA holds foreign contract manufacturers to the same rigorous expectations as domestic ones.
That means supplier quality agreements must be rock-solid. Technology transfer protocols must be carefully crafted to avoid quality erosion. And, perhaps most critically, your team must be ready for regulatory scrutiny—whether that’s an FDA inspection or a notified body audit under MDSAP.
The current U.S. administration has made supply chain security a top priority. Recent executive orders and congressional action—including the Make PPE in America Act, the CHIPS and Science Act, and targeted tariff expansions—signal a determined push to restore domestic production, especially for critical healthcare products.
Federal agencies have been directed to prioritize domestic manufacturers in procurement and streamline regulatory pathways for U.S.-based production. The FDA has responded with efforts to expedite market access, especially for companies that realign their supply chains in accordance with national priorities.
The U.S. Department of Commerce released the attached notice regarding an investigation under Section 232 (19 USC 1862) of imports of “personal protective equipment (PPE), medical consumables, and medical equipment, including devices.”
In short, where you manufacture has become as important as how you manufacture.
In the current climate, where the U.S. is emphasizing national security in relation to domestic manufacturing, medical device companies, like multinational corporations, face a dual challenge: responding to U.S. reshoring mandates while preserving hard-won market access in critical regions such as China. The decision to move manufacturing out of China for reasons of U.S. national security can have significant regulatory consequences for commercial operations within China itself.
For example, moving production out of China would require re-registration with the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) for the commercialization of U.S.-manufactured medical devices, if the original registration was based on local production. This could potentially jeopardize existing product registrations and market eligibility if not managed with precision. Moreover, shifting manufacturing would disrupt contract manufacturing and distribution agreements and complicate export certification. Companies also need to consider how the change in manufacturing location will affect any tax incentives it has enjoyed and the repayment of funds. Companies must prepare for restructuring their quality systems and for heightened scrutiny: China's GMP is highly aligned with ISO 13485, but the two are not equivalent.
Relocating a manufacturing facility involves more than just logistics. It requires a balance of factors such as business continuity, a stable supply of raw materials and components, cost-effectiveness, dual-market regulatory scrutiny, and geopolitical government requests.
To ensure a smooth transition that preserves speed to market and regulatory standing, medical device companies should consider the following strategic steps:
Relocation is not just operational—it’s regulatory and legal. That’s why we’ve built a team of seasoned FDA, NMPA, and EU attorneys, ISO 13485-certified auditors, and global compliance strategists to guide clients through every aspect of the journey.
Here’s what we bring to the table:
Whether you're transitioning from Shenzhen to San Diego or Bratislava to Baja, we offer strategic foresight rooted in regulatory rigor—so you can scale confidently while protecting product quality and patient safety.
Near-shoring and friend-shoring can enhance resilience, stabilize production, and align your company with national economic and security objectives. But doing it right requires more than vision—it takes cross-functional planning, technical documentation, and unwavering compliance discipline.
For companies ready to shift borders while preserving trust, reputation, and quality, it starts with asking the right questions—and partnering with those who know how to answer them.
Let’s map your future—strategically, securely, and with regulatory precision.
Authored by Jodi Scott, Mike Heyl, and Jessie Xie.