
Judgment in the Cloud: The future of risk and regulation with James Lord, Google Cloud
A reform of the EU design protection framework was long awaited as a response to emerging technologies. In particular, prior to the reform, it was uncertain whether the creation of a medium or software (usually CAD files) to enable 3D printing of products embodying a protected design constitutes an infringement of intellectual property rights (see Kur, GRUR 2024, 1264, 1270).
Copyright law was considered in Germany to be the intellectual property right offering the best protection against product piracy with 3D printers, insofar as creating a CAD file embodying a copyright-protected work could be considered as being a reproduction in accordance with Section 16 UrhG; and offering it on an Internet platform could be considered as making it available to the public in accordance with Section 19a UrhG (see Nordemann/Rüberg/Schaefer, NJW 2015, 1265, 1265 et. seqq.). However, copyright protection is only granted to an author's own intellectual creations that meet the required threshold of originality.
In October 2024, the EU adopted the design legislative reform. which is focused on the modernisation of the design protection framework in consideration of emerging technologies and economic realities. The reform includes the revised EU Design Regulation ("EUDR", Regulation (EU) 2024/2822) and the new EU Design Directive ("EUDD", Directive (EU) 2024/2823). Most provisions of the EUDR already apply since 1 May, 2025; and some provisions will apply from July 1, 2026.
As a core amendment concerning 3D printing, the EUDR now provides for an exclusive right for "creating, downloading, copying and sharing or distributing to others any medium or software which records the design for the purpose of enabling a [design incorporating product] to be made" (Art. 19 para. 2 lit. d EUDR). On a national level, all EU member states must establish corresponding rules on the basis of Art. 16 para. 2 lit. d EUDD.
The wording of Art. 19 para. 2 lit. d EUDR that the design must be "recorded" on any medium or software could still leave doubts as to whether this applies to a CAD file, which does not contain the design directly, but key information about the designed object such as its geometry and visual attributes (see, for example. Fischoeder, GRUR 2024, 873, 874). However, the purpose of Art. 19 para. 2 lit. d EUDR is to effectively prevent illegitimate copying of protected designs as an appropriate measure in view of the growing deployment of 3D printing technologies in different areas of industry (Recital 14 EUDR). Therefore, the EU legislator intended to include current state-of-the-art data files created and distributed for the 3D printing of products, and the vague wording should be interpreted as being open also for (new) technologies rather than being restrictive and potentially excluding CAD files.
The amendment of the EU design legislative framework strengthens the position of right holders in the context of 3D printing by increasing legal certainty in a previously vague legal environment. Companies with a focus on business areas particularly vulnerable to emerging 3D printing capabilities should consider widening their European IP portfolio to (more) registered designs.
Authored by Yvonne Draheim LL.M./Univ. Stellenbosch, and Lennart Matzen.
First published in Legal Industry Reviews, (Germany, Edition 8).