
UK and U.S. economic prosperity deal takes effect – Key takeaways
On 4 June 2025, the European Data Protection Board published guidelines clarifying how EU-based companies should assess requests from foreign authorities for access to EU personal data. The EDPB emphasizes that such requests cannot be automatically recognized within the EU. Before disclosing personal data to foreign authorities, EU companies must confirm on a case-by-case basis that doing so will not violate the GDPR's rules on data processing and international transfers.
Article 48 of the GDPR states a judgment of a court or tribunal or a decision of an administrative authority of a third country requiring a controller or processor to transfer or disclose personal data may only be recognized or enforceable if based on an international agreement, such as a mutual legal assistance treaty, in force between the requesting third country and the EU or a Member State. In other words, decisions or judgments from non-EU authorities requiring the disclosure of personal data by EU-based entities are not automatically enforceable within the EU. Recognition of such requests expressly requires a valid international agreement.
In its Guidelines 02/2024 on Article 48 GDPR (the Guidelines), the EDPB clarifies the scope and application of Article 48 and outlines the four-step assessment that companies must follow to determine whether a foreign request can be lawfully fulfilled.
When receiving a request from a foreign authority, EU-based companies should assess whether:
If the above conditions are not met, reliance on Article 48 GDPR will not be possible. In such cases, companies must instead rely on the standard GDPR framework for disclosing EU personal data through international transfers, ensuring a valid legal basis for the disclosure and the use of an appropriate transfer mechanism.
The Guidelines come at a time when cross-border data flows remain a point of legal and operational tension for EU companies operating internationally. EU personal data exports have long been a difficult issue, particularly in light of concerns about foreign governments’ ability to access EU personal data in jurisdictions where legal protections are not considered equivalent to those in the EU. These concerns were the basis for the Schrems I and II rulings that invalidated key transatlantic data transfers mechanisms (see our coverage of the Safe Harbor and Privacy Shield invalidations), and may lead to heightened scrutiny from regulators when evaluating transfers to foreign authorities.
The Guidelines reaffirm the EU’s legal sovereignty over personal data and clarify the need for companies to take a nuanced and legally grounded approach to foreign access requests. Notably, the step-by-step approach to Art. 48 GDPR applies regardless of whether the request is voluntary or compulsory.
In summary, EU companies must assess each request individually and cannot rely on foreign legal obligations as a defense if a European regulator finds the disclosure non-compliant with the GDPR.
To align with the EDPB’s guidance, EU-based companies should:
Authored by Eduardo Ustaran and Julian Flamant.
Special thanks to Alexandre Owen for assisting with the preparation of this post.